Strategy

Analysing Your Own Games: Your Personal Syllabus

Your own games are the most personalised study material in the world — and almost nobody uses them properly. Here's how to analyse them well.

F
FM Shreyas Smith
FIDE Master & Chess Coach
10 June 2026 4 min read
A hand writing notes in an open notebook with a pen, suggesting analysing and annotating a chess game.

If I could give a club player just one piece of advice, it would be this: analyse your own games. Not the games of grandmasters, not engine lines from the latest opening novelty — your games. Your own losses and wins are the most personalised, most relevant study material in the world, and almost nobody uses them properly. Here's how to do it well.

Why your own games matter most

Every game you play is a record of your decisions — your habits, your blind spots, your strengths under pressure. A grandmaster game shows you brilliant chess; your own game shows you the exact mistakes you keep making. One of those is a far more efficient teacher. The repeating errors you find become your study plan.

Analyse before the engine, not after

The single most important rule: do your own analysis first, then check with the engine. It's tempting to flip on Stockfish immediately and watch the evaluation bar — but that teaches you almost nothing. The engine tells you what but never why, and you don't build judgement by reading numbers.

Instead:

  1. Replay the game and write down, in words, where you think it turned and what you were thinking at each key moment.
  2. Note the moves you were unsure about and the plans you considered but rejected.
  3. Only then turn on the engine — to confirm or correct your own conclusions.

This way the engine sharpens your judgement instead of replacing it.

A practical analysis routine

Here's a routine you can run on any serious game in 20–30 minutes:

  • Opening: Did you reach a position you understood? Where did you (or your memory) leave "the book," and was your move sound? Note one improvement for next time.
  • Critical moments: Find the two or three moves where the game's character changed. What were the candidate moves? What did you miss?
  • Tactics check: Run the engine specifically to catch tactical oversights — for both sides. Missed shots are gold.
  • Decision quality, not just result: A move can be good even in a game you lost, and bad even in a game you won. Judge the decisions, not the scoreboard.

Hunt for patterns across many games

A single game tells you a little; twenty games tell you everything. The real power of self-analysis comes from spotting what repeats:

  • Do you keep getting into time trouble and blundering in the fourth hour?
  • Do you blunder most often when you're winning and relax?
  • Do you mishandle the same pawn structures again and again?
  • Do you collapse after a loss in the previous round?

These recurring patterns are your weaknesses made visible. Each one points directly at what to study next — that's how analysis turns into a personalised improvement plan.

Keep records

You can't see patterns you don't track. Keep a simple record:

  • Save your serious games (most online platforms do this automatically; record over-the-board games in a notebook or app).
  • Keep a short notes file of recurring mistakes and the lessons you've drawn.
  • Revisit your old analysis periodically — you'll be amazed how often the same note reappears until you finally fix the habit.

Be honest — and kind

Good self-analysis requires brutal honesty about your mistakes, paired with enough kindness to keep doing it. Don't bury a loss because it stings, and don't beat yourself up over a single error. Treat each game as data: what happened, why, and what will I do differently? That clinical, curious mindset is what separates players who improve from players who merely accumulate games.

A worked mini-example of the mindset

Suppose you lost a game where you were winning, then blundered a piece in time trouble on move 35. The lazy lesson is "I blundered." The useful analysis is:

  • Why was I in time trouble? I spent 25 minutes on one quiet position around move 18.
  • Why did I overthink a quiet position? I don't trust my judgement in calm positions, so I burn the clock.
  • Action: practise making faster decisions in non-critical positions, and save deep calculation for forcing moments.

See the difference? One sentence of blame versus a concrete, repeatable fix. That's the whole point.

Make it a habit

Analyse every serious game — win, lose, or draw. It needn't take long; even fifteen focused minutes pays off. Do it consistently and your own games become a feedback loop that keeps pointing you at exactly what to improve. No coach, course, or video can match that, because nothing else is about you.

Frequently asked questions

Yes, but do your own analysis first. Write down where you think the game turned and what you were thinking, then turn on the engine to confirm or correct your conclusions. The engine tells you what, not why — your judgement comes from doing the thinking first.

Find the two or three critical moments, check for tactical oversights for both sides, judge your decisions rather than the result, and — most importantly — look for patterns that repeat across many games. Those patterns are your study plan.

Analyse every serious game — win, lose or draw. It needn't take long; even fifteen focused minutes pays off and builds a feedback loop that points you at exactly what to improve.

F
FM Shreyas Smith
FIDE Master & Chess Coach

Shreyas Smith is a FIDE Master, seven-time National Chess Champion of Jamaica and the country's Chess Ambassador. He writes these guides to share the ideas, patterns and study methods that took him from a Calabar High School beginner to the Olympiad board — and to help the next generation of Caribbean players improve faster.